Was Mohammed Always Listening to God? Questioning the Divine Origins of Islam’s Violence

Questioning the Divine Origins of Islam’s Violence.

Islam, like Christianity and Judaism, claims divine origins. Muslims believe that the Qur’an is the literal word of God, revealed to the Prophet Mohammed through the angel Gabriel. But what if Mohammed wasn’t always listening to God? What if some of the messages he received were influenced by other forces—forces not divine, but dangerous? The violent passages within the Qur’an, when compared to the teachings of other Abrahamic religions, raise serious questions about the source of these revelations. Could it be that Mohammed, revered as the final prophet in Islam, was at times listening to the voice of Satan rather than the voice of God?

This isn't an attempt to demonize Islam, but rather a theological critique grounded in logic and Christian apologetics. Prophets, even those revered in history, can be wrong or misled. If God’s message is one of love, mercy, and peace, how do we reconcile that with the violent commandments found in Islam’s holiest text?

Questioning the Source of the Qur’an’s Violent Passages

Several Qur’anic passages, such as Surah 9:5 (“kill the polytheists wherever you find them”) and Surah 8:12 (“strike [unbelievers] upon the necks and strike from them every fingertip”), have been used to justify violence throughout history. Extremist groups like ISIS, Al-Qaeda, and Boko Haram use these passages as a foundation for acts of terror. But can such violent commands truly come from a loving and just God?

In Christianity, Jesus Christ teaches a radically different message. He tells his followers to “love your enemies” and offers forgiveness, even to those who would harm them. There is no call to violence in the Gospels. Why, then, does Mohammed’s revelation contain such starkly different instructions? Could it be that Mohammed was at times deceived? Christian theology teaches that Satan, the great deceiver, can mislead even the faithful. Could this explain the more violent aspects of the Qur’an?

Does God Only Speak Arabic? The Illogical Exclusivity of Islam

Another significant issue arises when we consider the linguistic limitations of the Qur'an. Islam teaches that the Qur'an is only truly the word of God when it is spoken or understood in Arabic. But does it make sense for an omnipotent God to limit His eternal message to a single language? Why would God’s message be exclusive to Arabic speakers?

Christianity, by contrast, transcends language. The Bible has been translated into hundreds of languages, with the understanding that God’s message is universal. The insistence in Islam that the Qur'an must be read in Arabic suggests a theological elitism and cultural specificity that contradict the idea of a universal God.

Was Islam intended for the Arab people alone? The Arabic-centric nature of the Qur'an and its revelations suggest that its message was tied to the cultural and historical context of 7th-century Arabia. If this is true, it begs the question of how Islam, with such deep linguistic and cultural roots, can apply universally, especially in a society like Britain.

The Violence in Israel: Islam’s Failure to Accept the Promised Land

The ongoing conflict between Israel and many Muslim-majority nations can also be traced back to theological disagreements. According to the Bible, the land of Israel was promised to the Jewish people by God. This divine covenant, which dates back to the time of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, is a foundational element of Jewish—and Christian—belief. Yet, Islam denies the legitimacy of this claim. Despite clear scriptural evidence in both the Old and New Testaments, Muslims continue to reject the Jewish right to the Promised Land.

This refusal to acknowledge the legitimacy of Jewish ties to Israel has led to decades of conflict, culminating in the extreme positions taken by groups like Hamas, whose charter explicitly calls for the destruction of Israel and the eradication of Jews from the face of the earth. This is not just a political issue; it is a deeply theological one, rooted in Islam’s failure to recognize the truth of the Holy Scriptures regarding the Jewish people’s divine right to the land.

Imagine, for a moment, how Muslims would react if a Jewish temple were to be built on Mecca, the holiest site in Islam. The outrage would be uncontainable. Yet, this is precisely what Muslims have done by building the Al-Aqsa Mosque on Temple Mount, the holiest site in Judaism. Theologically and morally, there is a compelling argument for Muslims to return the Al-Aqsa Mosque to the Jews and acknowledge the Jewish historical and religious claim to the land. This act of reconciliation could be a profound step towards peace in the region.

Hamas and the Satanic Influence Over Islam

Hamas, the militant Palestinian organization, makes no secret of its goals. In its manifesto, Hamas calls for the total destruction of Israel and the eradication of Jews. This declaration mirrors the violent commands found in the Qur'an, such as Surah 9:5, and raises disturbing theological questions. If Islam were truly a religion of peace, as many claim, how could such a hateful, genocidal goal be justified under its banner?

This is where the comparison to Satan becomes most compelling. In Christian theology, Satan is the author of lies and destruction. He seeks to sow hatred, division, and death. When we look at groups like Hamas and their call for the annihilation of an entire people, we see the hand of Satan at work. The hatred expressed towards Jews is not of God but of the adversary, who thrives on conflict and suffering. If such hatred and violence are being carried out in the name of Islam, it begs the question: has Satan’s influence pervaded the faith?

The Incompatibility of Islam and British Society

Given these theological and cultural considerations, it becomes clear that Islam, in its current form, is fundamentally incompatible with British society. Britain is built on democratic values, individual freedoms, and a legal system influenced by centuries of Christian thought. Sharia law, with its strict gender roles, blasphemy punishments, and limitations on personal freedoms, stands in stark contrast to these principles.

Moreover, the Arabic-centric nature of Islam suggests that it was designed for a specific people, in a specific time, in a specific place. How can a religion so deeply rooted in the cultural and linguistic context of 7th-century Arabia ever truly integrate into modern British society, with its diverse and pluralistic values? The truth is, it cannot—not without fundamental reform or significant adaptation, which orthodox Islam resists.

Conclusion: A Call for Critical Reflection

Britain, and indeed the wider world, must critically reflect on the role of Islam within its borders. The refusal to acknowledge Jewish claims to the Promised Land, the linguistic exclusivity of the Qur'an, and the violent elements within its teachings all point to a faith that is both theologically and culturally incompatible with Western values. The ongoing violence committed in the name of Islam, particularly by Arabic-speaking radicals, only reinforces the need for honest dialogue and reform.

It is time for Muslims to reconsider the source of their revelations. Were they always listening to God, or were they, at times, deceived by Satan’s influence? The future of peace and integration depends on a willingness to confront these difficult questions. For the sake of British society—and the world—this critical reflection is long overdue.

• BatPoo Forever

  @MyBatman1984

  FOLLOW BACK Extrapolating the arguments, critiquing the controversy. Transcending the cultural Bat Poo The Bat Truth Is Out There Let The Light Shine